The other day I was complaining about Nikon’s digital SLR lineup. I’ve been so disillusioned that I’ve even considered going to the Four Thirds format. Though I’m not sure how incredibly fantastic a semi-compact SLR would be for me. Sure it’d be idea on vacations, but big vacation plans aren’t really in my future. Besides, pushing around a stroller for the foreseeable future allows me to simply go full hog SLR. Just throw the SLR bag on top of everything else in the stroller.
Now, I’m starting to go in a completely different direction. Enter the Nikon Coolpix P90. $360. 12 megapixels. 24x optical zoom. Yea, that’s right. 24x. optical. 35mm equivalent is 26 – 624 mm. What a beautiful number. 624. mmmmmmmm. candy.
I bought the Nikon Coolpix 8800 back in 2005. 10 megapixels 10x zoom (300 mm). It was perfect for our trips to London and San Diege before our daughter came along. I could sneak it into a small bag and no one knew I was a tourist. In fact, I had two people ask me for directions in London because they thought I was a local. I like that.
However, I dropped my 8800 reaching for a batting practice ball at Petco Park (in San Diego) and it hasn’t been the same since. A few months ago I received the dreaded “Lens Error” which is the kiss of death for the 8800. So I kinda miss that camera now. It was fun bringing it to Wrigley Field and Brookfield Zoo. Taking photos at those two locations with a “300 mm” lens was one of my favorite pastimes. And now I could continue that hobby with a “624 mm” lens? bahama mamma.
Yet, the P90’s 1/2.33″ image sensor is super tiny when compared to Nikon’s DX sensor and even the Four Thirds sensor. Heck, it’s even smaller than the 1/1.8″ sensors found on most point-and-shoot cameras. Forget the P90. Right? Though I keep hearing a soft voice saying “624! 624!” This will require an investigation at my local camera store. Maybe I’ll just get the AF Zoom-NIKKOR 70-300mm f/4-5.6G lens ($600 retail).